Let's Clean Up Justice Systems

conference symbol

Join us at the International Convention on Open Justice

to discuss how best to use modern technology to open up justice systems. Contact us if interested in attending/sponsoring it..

smartphone

International OpenTrial Court Monitoring - Observers Needed

WHAT? - Court monitoring is a process of observing and gathering information on court practices and procedures and a vehicle for promoting improvements in the justice system. 
WHO? - Monitoring is best done by outside observers, Read more

karen tse of ibj

The Law's Majestic Equality.

Economic, social, and procedural barriers prevent the great majority of poor people in the world from achieving justice in courts. But what happens where social and economic (SE) rightsare enshriined in constitutions? Then, according to Varun Gauri and Dan Brinks, the impact of courts is positive: very much pro-poor in India and South Africa, distribution-neutral in Indonesia and Brazil; but sharply anti-poor in Nigeria.

tyranny of good intentions

US, clean up your act!

OpenTrial opposes extradition to the US until basic fair trial criteria are satisfied there.   Also see  "Legitimising Legal Dysfunction"

The Tyranny of Good Intentions.

By: Paul Craig Roberts (a former assistant secretary of the U.S. Treasury) and Lawrence M. Stratton. If you thought weak rule of law only exists in the developing world, think again, for here is an excellent, eye-opening book that exposes the shocking erosion of the rule of law in the U.S. more

Also, read this New York Times article about  police officers planting drugs, making false arrests, smuggling guns and being involved in corruption. 

ti advocacy tool kit

Transparency International's Advocacy Toolkit is an excellent guide to combating judicial corruption in various countries. Team up with us to implement it. Click here for a pdf copy.

legal system dysfunction

Here we will be reviewing legal systems from around the world using the published findings of various bodies and professionals. more

aristides-282nd-century-greek-christian-writer-author-of-the-apology-of-aristides29

Here's an Oath to Justice to help revive the ethic of Aristides

A quiet, steady man who loved justice and truth, Aristides was not interested in increasing his own wealth or prestige and despised mercenary motives in public men. Click here

state-power piracy

State-Power Piracy - under colour of official right

A work-in-progress look at existing remedies and deterrents for state-power piracy with the view to possible consolidation into a template for a bill, for adaptation and enactment, which would make state-power piracy a serious criminal offence around the world, while at the same time ensuring judicial independence . more

From the Gazette

OpenTrial Gazette

fauziah ibrahim 005

Fauziah Ibrahim, of Al Jazeera English, looks at Indonesia’s Justice System, and finds it riddled with corruption and incompetent investigative procedures, where trials and sentences are often deemed unfair.

Also, OpenTrial provides more details as to why Indonesia’s court system is not credible and the danger this poses, particularly when death sentences are meted out for drug-related crimes.

white_elephant3

Strictly no (more) white elephants

If today’s rule-of-law industry were in the private sector it would be on its last legs, or long extinct.
ronald k noble

Interpol Boss Sees Red Over Red Notices

While concerns grow that Red Notices are not only being issued in violation of human rights, but also that corrupt police forces extend their reach with them, Interpol Chief, Ronald Noble, is angrily dismissive when probed. Click here to read a related article in The New Jurist.

nigeria map

Judicial Independence & Nigeria’s Nascent Democracy

The article examines the administration of justice in Nigeria’s nascent ‘democracy’, including the independence and impartiality of the judiciary, corruption in the judiciary, the delay in judicial process, etc.

Citizens Protection Act

Citizens Protection Act of 1998 (Introduced in House)

HR 3396 IH

105th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 3396

To establish standards of conduct for Department of Justice employees, and to establish a review board to monitor compliance with such standards.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

March 5, 1998

Mr. MCDADE (for himself and Mr. MURTHA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To establish standards of conduct for Department of Justice employees, and to establish a review board to monitor compliance with such standards.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the `Citizens Protection Act of 1998'.

SEC. 2. INTERPRETATION.

    It is the intent of this Act that the term `employee' shall be interpreted so as to include, but not be limited to, an attorney, investigator, special prosecutor, or other employee of the Department of Justice as well as an attorney, investigator, accountant, or a special prosecutor acting under the authority of the Department of Justice.

TITLE I--ETHICAL STANDARDS FOR FEDERAL PROSECUTORS

SEC. 101. ETHICAL STANDARDS FOR FEDERAL PROSECUTORS.

    (a) IN GENERAL- Chapter 31 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

`Sec. 530B. Ethical standards for attorneys for the Government

      • `530B. Ethical standards for attorneys for the Government.'.

  • `(a) An attorney for the Government shall be subject to State laws and rules, and local Federal court rules, governing attorneys in each State where such attorney engages in that attorney's duties, to the same extent and in the same manner as other attorneys in that State.

    `(b) The Attorney General shall make and amend rules of the Department of Justice to assure compliance with this section.

    `(c) As used in this section, the term `attorney for the Government' includes any attorney described in section 77.2(a) of part 77 of title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations.'.

    (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT- The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

TITLE II--PUNISHABLE CONDUCT

SEC. 201. PUNISHABLE CONDUCT.

      • (1) in the absence of probable cause seek the indictment of any person;

        (2) fail promptly to release information that would exonerate a person under indictment;

        (3) intentionally mislead a court as to the guilt of any person;

        (4) intentionally or knowingly misstate evidence;

        (5) intentionally or knowingly alter evidence;

        (6) attempt to influence or color a witness' testimony;

        (7) act to frustrate or impede a defendant's right to discovery;

        (8) offer or provide sexual activities to any government witness or potential witness;

        (9) leak or otherwise improperly disseminate information to any person during an investigation; or

        (10) engage in conduct that discredits the Department.

      • (1) probation;

        (2) demotion;

        (3) dismissal;

        (4) referral of ethical charges to the bar;

        (5) loss of pension or other retirement benefits;

        (6) suspension from employment; and

        (7) referral of the allegations, if appropriate, to a grand jury for possible criminal prosecution.

  • (a) VIOLATIONS- The Attorney General shall establish, by plain rule, that it shall be punishable conduct for any Department of Justice employee to--

    (b) PENALTIES- The Attorney General shall establish penalties for engaging in conduct described in subsection (a) that shall include--

SEC. 202. COMPLAINTS.

    (a) WRITTEN STATEMENT- A person who believes that an employee of the Department of Justice has engaged in conduct described in section 201(a) may submit a written statement, in such form as the Attorney General may require, describing the alleged conduct.

    (b) PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION- Not later than 30 days after receipt of a written statement submitted under subsection (a), the Attorney General shall conduct a preliminary investigation and determine whether the allegations contained in such written statement warrant further investigation.

    (c) INVESTIGATION AND PENALTY- If the Attorney General determines after conducting a preliminary investigation under subsection (a) that further investigation is warranted, the Attorney General shall within 90 days further investigate the allegations and, if the Attorney General determines that a preponderance of the evidence supports the allegations, impose an appropriate penalty.

SEC. 203. MISCONDUCT REVIEW BOARD.

      • (1) three voting members appointed by the President, one of whom the President shall designate as Chairperson;

        (2) two non-voting members appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, one of whom shall be a Republican and one of whom shall be a Democrat; and

        (3) two non-voting members appointed by the Majority Leader of the Senate, one of whom shall be a Republican and one of whom shall be a Democrat.

      • (1) IN GENERAL- The Commission may issue subpoenas requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of any evidence relating to any matter under investigation by the Commission. The attendance of witnesses and the production of evidence may be required from any place within the United States.

        (2) FAILURE TO OBEY A SUBPOENA- If a person refuses to obey a subpoena issued under paragraph (1), the Commission may apply to a United States district court for an order requiring that person to appear before the Commission to give testimony, produce evidence, or both, relating to the matter under investigation. The application may be made within the judicial district where the hearing is conducted or where that person is found, resides, or transacts business. Any failure to obey the order of the court may be punished by the court as civil contempt.

        (3) SERVICE OF SUBPOENAS- The subpoenas of the Commission shall be served in the manner provided for subpoenas issued by a United States district court under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States district courts.

        (4) SERVICE OF PROCESS- All process of any court to which application is made under paragraph (2) may be served in the judicial district in which the person required to be served resides or may be found.

      • (1) PROHIBITION OF COMPENSATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES- Members of the Board who are full-time officers or employees of the United States, including Members of Congress, may not receive additional pay, allowances, or benefits by reason of their service on the Board.

        (2) TRAVEL EXPENSES- Each member shall receive travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, in accordance with sections 5702 and 5703 of title 5, United States Code.

      • (1) IN GENERAL- The Commission may issue subpoenas requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of any evidence relating to any matter [under investigation by the Commission] [which the Commission is empowered to investigate by section ]. The attendance of witnesses and the production of evidence may be required from any place within [the United States] [a State] [a judicial district] at any designated place of hearing within the [United States] [that State] [that judicial district].

        (2) FAILURE TO OBEY A SUBPOENA- If a person refuses to obey a subpoena issued under paragraph (1), the Commission may apply to a United States district court for an order requiring that person to appear before the Commission to give testimony, produce evidence, or both, relating to the matter under investigation. The application may be made within the judicial district where the hearing is conducted or where that person is found, resides, or transacts business. Any failure to obey the order of the court may be punished by the court as civil contempt.

        (3) SERVICE OF SUBPOENAS- The subpoenas of the Commission shall be served in the manner provided for subpoenas issued by a United States district court under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States district courts.

        (4) SERVICE OF PROCESS- All process of any court to which application is made under paragraph (2) may be served in the judicial district in which the person required to be served resides or may be found.]

  • (a) ESTABLISHMENT- There is established as an independent establishment a board to be known as the `Misconduct Review Board' (hereinafter in this Act referred to as the `Board').

    (b) MEMBERSHIP- The Board shall consist of--

    (c) NON-VOTING MEMBERS SERVE ADVISORY ROLE ONLY- The non-voting members shall serve on the Board in an advisory capacity only and shall not take part in any decisions of the Board.

    (d) SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN STATEMENT TO BOARD- If the Attorney General makes no determination pursuant to section 202(b) or imposes no penalty under section 202(c), a person who submitted a written statement under section 202(a) may submit such written statement to the Board.

    (e) REVIEW OF ATTORNEY GENERAL DETERMINATION- The Board shall review all determinations made by the Attorney General under sections 202(b) or 202(c).

    (f) BOARD INVESTIGATION- In reviewing a determination with respect to a written statement under subsection (e), or a written statement submitted under subsection (d), the Board may investigate the allegations made in the written statement as the Board considers appropriate.

    (g) SUBPOENA POWER-

    (h) MEETINGS- The Board shall meet at the call of the Chairperson or a majority of its voting members. All meetings shall be open to the public. The Board is authorized to sit where the Board considers most convenient given the facts of a particular complaint, but shall give due consideration to conducting its activities in the judicial district where the complainant resides.

    (i) DECISIONS- Decisions of the Board shall be made by majority vote of the voting members.

    (j) AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE PENALTY- After conducting such independent review and investigation as it deems appropriate, the Board by a majority vote of its voting members may impose a penalty, including dismissal, as provided in section 201(b) as it considers appropriate.

    (k) COMPENSATION-

    (l) EXPERTS AND CONSULTANTS- The Board may procure temporary and intermittent services under section 3109(b) of title 5, United States Code, but at rates for individuals not to exceed $200 per day.

    (m) STAFF OF FEDERAL AGENCIES- Upon request of the Chairperson, the head of any Federal department or agency may detail, on a reimbursable basis, any of the personnel of that department or agency to the Board to assist it in carrying out its duties under this Act.

    (n) OBTAINING OFFICIAL DATA- The Board may secure directly from any department or agency of the United States information necessary to enable it to carry out this Act. Upon request of the Chairperson of the Board, the head of that department or agency shall furnish that information to the Board.

    (o) MAILS- The Board may use the United States mails in the same manner and under the same conditions as other departments and agencies of the United States.

    (p) ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES- Upon the request of the Board, the Administrator of General Services shall provide to the Board, on a reimbursable basis, the administrative support services necessary for the Board to carry out its responsibilities under this Act.

    (q) CONTRACT AUTHORITY- The Board may contract with and compensate government and private agencies or persons for services, without regard to section 3709 of the Revised Statutes (41 U.S.C. 5).

    [( ) SUBPOENA POWER-

      • (1) IN GENERAL- The Commission may issue subpoenas requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of any evidence relating to any matter [under investigation by the Commission] [which the Commission is empowered to investigate by section ]. The attendance of witnesses and the production of evidence may be required from any place within [the United States] [a State] [a judicial district] at any designated place of hearing within the [United States] [that State] [that judicial district].

        (2) FAILURE TO OBEY A SUBPOENA- If a person refuses to obey a subpoena issued under paragraph (1), the Commission may apply to a United States district court for an order requiring that person to appear before the Commission to give testimony, produce evidence, or both, relating to the matter under investigation. The application may be made within the judicial district where the hearing is conducted or where that person is found, resides, or transacts business. Any failure to obey the order of the court may be punished by the court as civil contempt.

        (3) SERVICE OF SUBPOENAS- The subpoenas of the Commission shall be served in the manner provided for subpoenas issued by a United States district court under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States district courts.

        (4) SERVICE OF PROCESS- All process of any court to which application is made under paragraph (2) may be served in the judicial district in which the person required to be served resides or may be found.]